Both campaign tiers are priced per domain, per month. For a Miami business running an English site and a Spanish site, that single detail decides the whole budget — and it also raises a question most owners here have never been asked out loud: does the Spanish domain deserve the same tier as the English one?
The list price is short enough to state in one line. AutoSEO is $149 per month per domain, FullSEO is $500 per month per domain, and two add-ons sit on top of either. What that turns into over a year depends almost entirely on how many domains you have and which tier each one gets.
What follows is the price list, what each tier actually does, how the keyword pool is assembled and approved, a twelve-month calculation for a two-domain Miami business with deliberately different tiers on each, and a realistic view of when any of it shows up.
Per domain is the whole decision
Almost every pricing argument about these tiers is really an argument about domain count. A single-site business compares $149 against $500 and picks one. A business with two sites is choosing between four combinations, and three of them cost different amounts.
| Setup | Domain A | Domain B | Base per month | Base per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One site | AutoSEO | — | $149 | $1,788 |
| One site | FullSEO | — | $500 | $6,000 |
| Two sites, both light | AutoSEO | AutoSEO | $298 | $3,576 |
| Two sites, split | FullSEO | AutoSEO | $649 | $7,788 |
| Two sites, both full | FullSEO | FullSEO | $1,000 | $12,000 |
The gap between the two tiers is $351 per month, or $4,212 over a year, per domain. That is the number worth holding onto, because it is what you pay each time you decide a second site deserves the higher tier.
AutoSEO, and what running unattended means
AutoSEO — the campaign runs itself
For a site that needs continuous, competent work without anyone on your side steering it weekly.
- Keyword discovery and prioritization, automatic. The pool is assembled and ordered without you selecting terms one by one.
- Backlink building, automatic. Placements go out across a partner network of more than 230,000 websites. You do not choose the donors.
- On-site suggestions from the model. Concrete page-level recommendations, delivered as a work list rather than a score.
- Full analytics, not a cut-down version. The complete Search Console and SERP views come with the lower tier — clicks, impressions, positions, competitors, country and device splits.
- Live AI chat on the project. Questions answered against the project's real data rather than in general terms.
The thing worth noticing is what is not withheld. Analytics is not the upsell — the reporting is the same at both tiers. What $149 buys is a campaign that makes its own decisions, and what it does not buy is the ability to overrule them.
FullSEO, and the switch between modes
FullSEO — the same engine, with a steering wheel
For a site where somebody on your side has an opinion about which keywords and which links are acceptable.
- Manual keyword selection, with automatic fallback. Choose the terms yourself; anything you leave untouched is handled automatically instead of stalling.
- Manual backlink placement with a domain rating target. Set the quality floor for donors rather than accepting whatever the automation selects.
- Human review mode for on-site changes. Model-generated edits wait for approval instead of going live, which matters on regulated copy.
- A team behind the automation. FullSEO includes SEO specialists, developers and writers alongside the automated campaign.
- Everything in AutoSEO, unchanged. The automatic paths remain available; the upper tier adds control, it does not replace the engine.
The mode switch is the honest reason to pay the difference. In FullSEO each decision point has a manual path and an automatic one, and you can sit anywhere between them: pick the twenty keywords that matter and let the system fill the rest, set a donor quality floor and let placement proceed, or hold on-site edits for review while everything else runs.
The trap is paying for control you will not use. A clinic with a marketing manager who reviews a keyword list every Tuesday gets full value from the upper tier. The same clinic with nobody in that seat is paying $351 a month for switches that stay in the automatic position, which is AutoSEO with a larger invoice.
Wikipedia and PBN placements
Both add-ons attach to either tier and are priced per slot, so they scale in visible steps rather than as a percentage of anything.
Wikipedia placements
Small quantities, high unit price, chosen in fixed steps.
- Four settings, not a slider. Zero, one, five or ten slots. Ten slots is $100 per month on top of the tier.
- Volume is not the point. The steps are small because the value per placement does not scale the way link counts do.
- Works on either tier. An AutoSEO domain can carry the add-on without moving to FullSEO.
PBN placements
Cheap per slot, sold in large blocks, and the add-on most often bought wrongly.
- Four blocks. Zero, 20, 100 or 500 slots — $0, $20, $100 or $500 per month.
- 500 slots costs the same as a FullSEO subscription. That comparison is worth making before ticking the largest block.
- Separate from the partner network. The main campaign already places links across more than 230,000 sites; this is an addition to that, not the source of it.
Three sources, and a candidate-by-candidate approval
The keyword pool is not typed in by hand and it is not a single export. It is assembled from three inputs and then filtered one term at a time.
Google Search Console
What you already rank for, including the terms nobody chose. On a bilingual property this is where you discover which language a page is actually being found in.
- Real impressions and clicks
- Two-day reporting lag
Live SERP data
What the results page currently looks like for a term, who occupies it, and which competing domains share your keyword space.
- Competitors and their authority
- Current positions, not historical
Your own seed keywords
The terms your business knows matter and no tool would infer — service names, neighborhoods, the phrasing customers actually use in each language.
- Trade vocabulary
- Local and cross-border terms
Approve, reject or defer
Every candidate is handled individually. Deferring is not rejecting: the term stays in the pool for a later cycle rather than disappearing.
- Three states per candidate
- No all-or-nothing import
The third source is where a Miami business earns most of its advantage, and it is the one automation cannot supply. A model will not know that your patients say one thing in Spanish and something different in English for the same procedure, or that a term used in Bogotá is not the term used in Hialeah. Seed lists can be handed to the Stream assistant in batches rather than entered one at a time.
Does the Spanish domain deserve the same tier?
This is the question the per-domain price forces, and it deserves a real answer rather than a reflex. In most of the country the Spanish site is a secondary audience and the reflex — English gets the upper tier — is roughly right. In Miami that reflex is frequently backwards.
Here the Spanish-language version is often the larger audience, the one that converts, and the one competing in a thinner field where good work goes further. Meanwhile the English site may be serving out-of-state and international enquiries perfectly well on automation alone. Tier allocation should follow revenue and contest, not language status.
The domain that carries the bookings
Regulated copy, a named reviewer, a field close enough that donor quality decides it. In Miami this is frequently the Spanish site.
- Manual keyword selection
- Donor quality floor
The domain that runs on its own
Steady enquiries, nobody free to steer it weekly, and no copy that has to be approved before it goes live.
- Same analytics, same reporting
- Reviewed again at six months
- Which domain produces bookings today. Not sessions. Bookings, calls, quotes, signed matters. If the Spanish site produces two thirds of them, it is the one that justifies control.
- Which language field is more contested. The SERP views show competing domains and their authority per keyword space. A thinner Spanish field means the upper tier buys more movement per dollar.
- Where regulated copy lives. Clinics and legal practices need human review mode on whichever domain carries claims about treatment or outcomes — often both, sometimes only one.
- Who will actually steer it. Manual selection needs a person. If your Spanish-speaking marketing lead is the one with opinions, the upper tier belongs on the Spanish domain regardless of which site is older.
- Where cross-border demand lands. Buyers in Bogotá, Caracas and San Juan usually arrive on the Spanish domain. The country split tells you how much of your demand that is.
A worked example with deliberately different tiers
Take a three-location dental and aesthetics group in Coral Gables, Doral and Hialeah. It runs two domains: a Spanish site that produces most of its patient bookings, and an English site that serves out-of-state and international enquiries. The Spanish domain gets FullSEO because the marketing lead reviews keywords and treatment copy. The English domain runs on AutoSEO.
| Line | Spanish domain | English domain | Twelve-month total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier | FullSEO, $500 × 12 | AutoSEO, $149 × 12 | $7,788 |
| PBN, months 1–3 | 20 slots, $20 × 3 | none | $60 |
| PBN, months 4–12 | 100 slots, $100 × 9 | 20 slots, $20 × 9 | $1,080 |
| Wikipedia, months 4–12 | 5 slots, $50 × 9 | none | $450 |
| Wikipedia, months 7–12 | none | 1 slot, $10 × 6 | $60 |
| Domain total | $7,410 | $2,028 | $9,438 |
That is $9,438 for the year, an average of $786.50 a month across both properties. Subscriptions account for $7,788 of it and add-ons for $1,650 — about 17 percent, which is roughly where add-ons should sit when nobody has over-ordered slots.
The comparison is the useful part. Putting both domains on FullSEO would cost $13,650 — $4,212 more, spent on control nobody was going to exercise on the English site. Putting both on AutoSEO would cost $5,226 and save the same $4,212, at the price of losing manual keyword selection and human review on the domain that carries the bookings and the regulated copy. The split sits between them because the two domains genuinely have different jobs.
What twelve months actually looks like
First measurable movement typically appears four to eight weeks after work starts. That is movement in the analytics — keywords entering the top thirty, impressions rising, a page appearing where it did not before — and not revenue.
Two things stretch that window on a bilingual setup. Each domain runs its own campaign on its own timeline, so two properties starting in the same month rarely move in the same month. And a second domain that was never properly indexed starts its clock when its pages become findable, not when the subscription begins.
| Window | What to expect | What not to conclude |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1–4 | Pool assembled, first placements, on-site list produced | That nothing is happening |
| Weeks 4–8 | First measurable movement in impressions and positions | That the trend is established |
| Months 3–6 | Keyword dynamics show entries into the top thirty and top ten | That the second domain is failing if it lags |
| Months 6–12 | Position history long enough to separate signal from seasonality | That a flat quarter means a wrong tier |
Judge a tier decision at six months, not at six weeks. The keyword dynamics view — which terms entered or fell out of the top three, ten and thirty — is the reading that tells you whether the upper tier is earning its $351 a month on that domain.
Questions that come up on the invoice
Can we run different tiers on our two domains?
Yes. Pricing is per domain, so each site carries its own tier and its own add-on slots. In a bilingual setup that is usually the correct answer rather than a compromise, because the two domains rarely have the same job.
Is analytics limited on the cheaper tier?
No. The Search Console and SERP views, the competitor analysis and the country and device splits come with AutoSEO. The upper tier adds manual control over keywords, placement and on-site changes, plus the team behind them — not extra dashboards.
Should we buy 500 PBN slots instead of upgrading a domain?
The two cost the same $500 a month, and in most situations the upgrade is the better purchase. It buys a donor quality floor, manual keyword selection and human review, where the slot block buys volume from one channel. Volume is the easiest thing to over-buy and the hardest to undo.
How do we know when a domain is ready to move up?
When a named person is reviewing keyword candidates and on-site edits, and when the analytics show that domain producing business rather than sessions. Both conditions, not either one. Absent the first, the manual switches stay in automatic position and you are paying $351 a month for nothing.
Are the add-on slots a monthly charge?
Read the price list as per month, per domain, the same way the tiers are priced. That is how the worked example above is built: every line is a monthly slot count multiplied by the number of months it was active, which is also why staging the blocks changes the annual total so much.
AutoSEO suits a domain that needs consistent work and has nobody to steer it: a second-language site being built out, a portfolio property, an English site serving enquiries that already convert. It is not a trial version — it runs the same engine and reports through the same analytics.
FullSEO suits a domain where someone has opinions and the authority to act on them, where copy is regulated, or where the competitive field is close enough that donor quality decides the outcome. On a Miami two-domain setup that is often the Spanish site, and saying so out loud is usually the most useful thing an agency can do in the first meeting. Details of how we set this up are on our blog, and the audit that precedes it is part of what we run for clients.
Whichever way the split falls, the mechanics are the same. AutoSEO at $149 per month per domain handles discovery, placement and on-site suggestions without supervision. FullSEO at $500 per month per domain adds manual keyword selection with automatic fallback, placement against a domain rating target, human review mode and the team behind it. The Wikipedia and PBN add-ons attach to either. Site tags filter a portfolio down to one property, and the Stream assistant takes keyword and URL lists in batches, which suits a two-domain operation producing two lists for every task.
Work out the domain count first, the tier per domain second, and the slot blocks last. Then connect both domains and open the campaign view to see what each one is actually competing against. In this market the number that surprises people is rarely the price — it is how much cheaper the Spanish field turns out to be to win.